Venkat Yekkirala wrote: >>I'm glad to see there is still discussion going on over on >>the SELinux list >>involving the secid patches but I'm a little concerned that >>there has not been >>any real discussion about how to handle flow control while >>staying within the >>constraints outlined above? Venkat, is this something that >>has already been >>taken into account and will appear in the next patch set? > > I can not guarantee that. I believe James' hesitation mainly > comes from the fact that there are people confused out there.
Okay, I guess we will just have to wait and see; I'm afarid this is still going to meet with disapproval but hopefully not. Just an FYI: once you post your updated patches I'm going to wait until James has had a chance to look them over before I respin the whole patchset and post to netdev (this also assumes the policy issues are squared away as well). > Once people are confused no more, they will have to take it > up with James (while watching out for you though :)) > since James DID ack this approach once in the past and seems to > have since backed out mainly (from my POV) because of the prevailing > confusion coming mainly from you and Joshua. Venkat, please don't mistake my concerns as confusion. -- paul moore linux security @ hp -- redhat-lspp mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-lspp
