On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 06:15:19PM -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > Linda Knippers wrote: > >Klaus Weidner wrote: > >>a new kickstart RPM - with this version, polyinstantiation should > >>work again in enforcing mode, and some other issues have been fixed. > >>Thanks to Linda and George for their contributions! > >> > >>IMPORTANT: this REQUIRES post-beta-snapshot updated packages, the ks > >>script will instruct you in the postinstall section about the > >>details. I used the following for i386: [...] > >I see you're getting policy packages from rawhide. I'm pulling all of > >mine from Dan's people page where Dan is posting RHEL5 versions of the > >packages. At this point I'm not sure mixing packages from rawhide is > >safe. I think we should be using Dan's repo for the policy and > >related packages (policycoreutils, newrole) as well as for the pam > >packages. At least that's what I'm doing until Dan says otherwise. > > Yes do not use rawhide any longer. I am providing updated packages on > my people page, and these packages will show up in weekly update to RHN > i believe.
Sorry about the rawhide packages, that was due to a misunderstanding. Here's the package list I'm currently using: http://people.redhat.com/sgrubb/files/lspp/kernel-2.6.18-1.2840.2.1.el5.lspp.57.i686.rpm http://people.redhat.com/sgrubb/files/lspp/kernel-devel-2.6.18-1.2840.2.1.el5.lspp.57.i686.rpm http://people.redhat.com/dwalsh/SELinux/RHEL5/i386/pam-0.99.6.2-3.6.el5.i386.rpm http://people.redhat.com/dwalsh/SELinux/RHEL5/i386/pam-devel-0.99.6.2-3.6.el5.i386.rpm http://people.redhat.com/dwalsh/SELinux/RHEL5/noarch/selinux-policy-2.4.6-11.el5.noarch.rpm http://people.redhat.com/dwalsh/SELinux/RHEL5/noarch/selinux-policy-devel-2.4.6-11.el5.noarch.rpm http://people.redhat.com/dwalsh/SELinux/RHEL5/noarch/selinux-policy-mls-2.4.6-11.el5.noarch.rpm http://people.redhat.com/dwalsh/SELinux/RHEL5/noarch/selinux-policy-strict-2.4.6-11.el5.noarch.rpm http://people.redhat.com/dwalsh/SELinux/RHEL5/noarch/selinux-policy-targeted-2.4.6-11.el5.noarch.rpm RPM usually dies due to a corrupt database when trying to install them, do you need a bug report about that or is that a known regression? -Klaus -- redhat-lspp mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-lspp
