> > We jump to the fail without releasing the lock. > > Instead of a "fail", how about just breaking from the loop > > and falling through to release lock and return... > > Sure. That should work too. Thanks.
Also, you would have to make sure pol is set to NULL in this case. -- redhat-lspp mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-lspp
