On Friday 09 February 2007 12:33, James W. Hoeft wrote: > This doesn't address the behavior of the individual apps/daemons, but if > it isn't TOO much trouble to address an audit "failure" at that level, > in order to tailor the behavior based on the criticality of the system, > that would be ideal.
It doesn't sound like too much trouble for some operations. > (in the case of printing, our accreditors would want the job canceled - > other functions would be on a case-by-case basis) I think its reasonable to mark the printer unavailable to keep the job queued or even canceled. -Steve -- redhat-lspp mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-lspp
