Full ack. I actually wrote myself wrapper methods for that but then again I am a C++ developer....
On Wednesday 23 April 2008 18:25:47 Michael Stahl wrote: > hello! > > why do the librdf destructors not handle 0 arguments correctly? > i.e. they should just return, and not segfault like they currently do. > after all, the C free function and the C++ operator delete handle 0 > arguments the same, so i would guess that many people would implictily > assume that anything that frees stuff acts the same way. > > so, since writing this patch was less work than fixing the >2k lines of > code that i wrote last week, here is a patch that fixes all the publicly > documented librdf_free_foo functions. > will this go in the next release? > > regards, > michael stahl > > PS: just for the record, i would find it useful if there were a tarball of > librdf that does not contain raptor and rasqal _______________________________________________ redland-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.librdf.org/mailman/listinfo/redland-dev
