At 15:41 08/10/31, Martin Duerst wrote: >At 13:53 08/10/31, Martin Duerst wrote: >>Hello Lauri, >> >>Many thanks for your help. > >Continuing from previous post.
Continuing some more. >Looking at test-28-tuttle.ttl and test-28.out, test-28-turtle.ttl >seems to use a syntax close to N3, whereas test-28.out is expecting >something close to N-Triples. Also, test-28-turtle.ttl gives >'raw' numbers, whereas test-28.out expects double-quoted strings >followed by ^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#decimal>. Also, >the order of the numbers is different, and some details of the >numeric notation are different. I commented out check-turtle-serialize-syntax in raptor/tests/turtle/Makefile for the moment. I went to raptor/tests, and did make check-local Things went very well up to check-rdfxml (rdfxml serialization with legal rdf/xml). (make check-rdfxmla is also working fine) It turned out that I needed to do: > unix2dos ex-59.rdf ex-60.rdf (might have helped a tiny bit if these files were called ex-59.out and ex-60.out, but maybe there's a good reason why not) Moving one level higher, I got four errors in "Testing RDFA": 0094.xhtml Triple counts: expected: 5, got 2 0101.xhtml Triple counts: expected: 3, got 1 0102.xhtml Triple counts: expected: 3, got 1 0103.xhtml Triple counts: expected: 3, got 1 But then I got the message "Ignoring expected failures", so I'm assuming these are not too much of a problem. Moving still one level higher (now in the top redland directory again), make check worked for quite a while. There were some failures that were passed over: rasqal_decimal_test: Using double FAILED: (a+b)-b=1.234567888e9 expected 1.23456789e9 and two more immediately following. check-rdql: 1-09 FAILED Failing program was: roquet -d debug -i rdql ./test-1-09 2>roqet.err Difference is: --- result.out ... +++ roqet.out ... @@ -1 +0,0 @@ -result: [y=uri<http://rdf.hp.com/p-2>] Similar for B-17, but both seemed to be expected. Then things went south again. For "Testing SPARQL correct", it complained that it couldn't find XML/DOM.pm in @INC. I'm not exactly sure why I need Perl here, after all, we are not yet doing bindings, and I'm mostly interested in the Ruby binding. Any help appreciated. Regards, Martin. #-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University #-#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ redland-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.librdf.org/mailman/listinfo/redland-dev
