On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 09:37 -0700, Dave Beckett wrote: > Hi, I'm slammed with work stuff right now. Generally the place > for bindings is in the Redland bindings project. Raptor and rasqal > are intended to be C level APIs.
OK, you can accept it when you have more time. I do not haste. I provided a pull request for redland-bindings project. The pull request contains thick (object oriented) Ada binding of Raptor. It does not expose C level API in public parts of Ada packages, but rather an object oriented wrapper around it. About yesterday I though that it seems worth to add Rasqal Ada bindings to redland-bindings. I am going to work on this soon. > Can anyone do a second review on the Ada stuff. I'm not familiar > with it. I don't quite understand why you need somebody's other review. I wrote an Ada code and it does compile. That it does compile proves that it is Ada code not a fake nonsense. Moreover I have a test application for Ada code (however it covers only a part of code not all classes). If it is not a nonsense, then why do you want a third party to review it? Well, the next thing I am going to do is to modify configure.ac for better support of different Ada compiler versions which may be installed on a single machine "in parallel" or even parts of the compiler being not in PATH. This is not much work, but right now I am busy. > Dave > > > On Thu, 13 Jul 2017, Victor Porton wrote: > > > Earlier I announced my Raptor bindings for Ada and said that I am > NOT > > going to implement also Rasqal and Redland bindings. > > > > I have changed my mind and now I think that I will most probably do > > Rasqal bindings soon (not sure yet about Redland bindings however). > > > > P.S. Dave Beckett, are you alive? Why don't you answer? I have > provided > > you with pull requests: Raptor bindings for Ada and a building > failure > > with some versions of SWIG fix. > > _______________________________________________ > > redland-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.librdf.org/mailman/listinfo/redland-dev _______________________________________________ redland-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.librdf.org/mailman/listinfo/redland-dev
