We don't have enough information to talk about it.

On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Beaudoin, John <[email protected]>wrote:

> Oh he definitely saw it, but does he have the cajones to insist and control
> pitchers. That's my point. Tek would blow off the pitching coach and steer
> the pitcher. VM is probably not as confident and controlling at this point
> behind the plate.
>
> ------------------------------
>  *From*: [email protected] <[email protected]>
>
> *To*: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> *Sent*: Tue Sep 29 06:24:09 2009
> *Subject*: Re: Vent
>
> I also think that Martinez might know a thing or two about pitchers.
>
> If you saw it, you can bet that he did too.
>
> On Sep 29, 2009, at 8:57 AM, "Beaudoin, John" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> That's why I want to see the replay. I don't think his fastball had any
> movement whatsoever. I don't think it was thrown well and tek would have
> known it and not let him throw it after the first or second or third hit.
>
> No, we'll never know, and all for benching Tek, but I really believe he'd
> have made a difference last night with the rookies.
>
> John
>
> ------------------------------
>  *From*: [email protected] <[email protected]>
>
> *To*: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> *Sent*: Tue Sep 29 05:07:24 2009
> *Subject*: Re: Vent
>
> Well, we'll never know.  But I still think that wrong pitch thrown well is
> better than the right pitch thrown poorly.
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 7:46 AM, Beaudoin, John <<[email protected]>
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Weird night.
>> hey I liked that lefty we had. Was it "Richardson"? Where'd he come from?
>> The other two sucked, but he looked good.
>>
>> I maintain that Tek would have handled the pitches better and the game
>> would not have gotten out of control. Who even knew Bowden had a slider,
>> curve, and change until it was 4-0? I'd like to see the replay of the game
>> at home. I swear he threw almost all fastballs until they were down 4-0.
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>  *From*: 
>> <[email protected]>[email protected]<<[email protected]>
>> [email protected]>
>> *To*: <[email protected]>[email protected] 
>> <<[email protected]>
>> [email protected]>
>> *Sent*: Tue Sep 29 04:31:40 2009
>> *Subject*: Re: Vent
>>
>> The field was a swamp.
>>
>> I've never seen such rain.
>>
>> On Sep 28, 2009, at 10:47 PM, "Beaudoin, John" <<[email protected]>
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>  2 on, no outs, down by six in the 7th.
>> Downpour turning to rain, then light rain all lasting 20 to 30 minutes
>> until no rain and clearing sky.
>>
>> They canceled the game. WTF!!! I've never seen such a thing. I don't get
>> it. Did the Sox forfeit? I don't get it. One swing could make it a 3 run
>> game with 9 outs left.
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>  *From*: 
>> <[email protected]>[email protected]<<[email protected]>
>> [email protected]>
>> *To*: <[email protected]>[email protected] 
>> <<[email protected]>
>> [email protected]>
>> *Sent*: Mon Sep 28 17:22:44 2009
>> *Subject*: Re: Vent
>>
>>  I hate to start this, but it wouild be 2-2 and not 7-3 if Tek was
>> catching. Tek would have not let Bowden throw those fastballs and he also
>> would not have been on basae when Youk hit the HR.
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>  *From*: 
>> <[email protected]>[email protected]<<[email protected]>
>> [email protected]>
>> *To*: <[email protected]>[email protected] 
>> <<[email protected]>
>> [email protected]>
>> *Sent*: Mon Sep 28 16:41:22 2009
>> *Subject*: RE: Vent
>>
>> Momentum is in the eye of the beholder.
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>> *From:* 
>> <[email protected]>[email protected][mailto:<[email protected]>
>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Ray Salemi
>> *Sent:* Monday, September 28, 2009 12:49 PM
>> *To:* <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
>> [email protected]
>> *Subject:* Re: Vent
>>
>> Wow.  That exact game is my evidence as well.
>>
>> If momentum had any value at all, the Yankees would have been
>> unstoppable.  But fortunately, it didn't.
>>
>> Randomness does not mean evenness.  Stratomatic was also very streaky.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 8:28 AM, Steve Gendron < 
>> <[email protected]><[email protected]>
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>  I disagree Ray.  I think that momentum and confidence mean a lot in
>>> baseball.  Sure I know that these games mean nothing in the standings, but
>>> as a fan it is frustrating to see the Sox lose 8 straight and get swept by
>>> the Yankees, and it has to do something to the psyche of the players as
>>> well.
>>>
>>> I will use 2004 as a case in point.  The Red Sox were in a funk in the
>>> ALCS that year, losing 3 straight to the Yankees.  The 3rd in miserable
>>> fashion (as Tom can tell you), and furthermore they were about to lose game
>>> 4 when the Yankees handed the ball to Mariano with a 1 run lead in the
>>> ninth.  It took an unlikely and hugely emotional event to reverse their
>>> fortunes in that game - and it shifted the momentum of the series.  That
>>> momentum carried right thru the World Series.
>>>
>>> Why are baseball players and teams so streaky?  It is because of the
>>> shifts in confidence, momentum and emotions.  They are not playing
>>> strat-o-matic out there.  Human emotions make a difference, and I would
>>> prefer not to see them heading into the playoffs felling like they can't
>>> beat the Yankees.
>>>
>>> Steve
>>>
>>>  ------------------------------
>>> *From:* <[email protected]><[email protected]>
>>> [email protected] 
>>> [mailto:<[email protected]><[email protected]>
>>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Ray Salemi
>>> *Sent:* Sunday, September 27, 2009 5:26 PM
>>> *To:* <[email protected]><[email protected]>
>>> [email protected]
>>> *Subject:* Re: Vent
>>>
>>>  Oh Good Lord.  Haven't we learned yet that there is no such thing as a
>>> "head of steam" in baseball?
>>>
>>> It just takes one good pitcher to blow that steam away.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Steve Gendron < 
>>> <[email protected]><[email protected]>
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>  Your rant is right on target Matt.  I thought my head was going to
>>>> explode when Woodward blew that play on the rundown.  Does Francona think 
>>>> it
>>>> is a good idea to send the Yankees into the post-season with a head of
>>>> steam?  We took the first 8 games from the Yankees this season and now we
>>>> are on the verge of allowing them to tie the season series.  We've lost 8 
>>>> of
>>>> the last 9 games to these guys.  They have owned us in the second half.  
>>>> And
>>>> today, the brooms will be out as the Yanks prepare to win their 100th game
>>>> of the season and clinch the division.
>>>>
>>>> Take heart though, we've got Paul Byrd on the hill.
>>>>
>>>> Steve
>>>>
>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>> *From:* <[email protected]><[email protected]>
>>>> [email protected] 
>>>> [mailto:<[email protected]><[email protected]>
>>>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Matt & Olga McSorley
>>>> *Sent:* Saturday, September 26, 2009 7:17 PM
>>>> *To:* <[email protected]><[email protected]>
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> *Subject:* Vent
>>>>
>>>>     I know these games don't matter much in the long run, but...
>>>>
>>>> It is so frustrating watching Chris Woodward and Brian Anderson bumble
>>>> their way through life when a playoff spot has not yet been clinched, and
>>>> when a sweep this weekend gives the Yankees the division. Woodward's
>>>> ridiculous error in the eighth today, which led to two critical Yankee 
>>>> runs,
>>>> was painful to watch. Why the hell is he on the field? I mean, we all know
>>>> the bad guys are going to win the AL East but wouldn't you think the Sox
>>>> would manage and play this weekend as if avoiding having to watch them 
>>>> dance
>>>> all over the field mattered? For crying out loud, there's seven games with
>>>> Toronto and Cleveland this week to play the Pawtucket kiddie corps.
>>>>
>>>> OK. Rant over.
>>>>
>>>> -- Matt
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Author of "Leading After a Layoff: Reignite Your Team's Productivity in
>>> Just 12 Weeks"
>>> <http://www.leadingafteralayoff.com><http://www.leadingafteralayoff.com>
>>> www.leadingafteralayoff.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Author of "Leading After a Layoff: Reignite Your Team's Productivity in
>> Just 12 Weeks"
>> <http://www.leadingafteralayoff.com> <http://www.leadingafteralayoff.com>
>> www.leadingafteralayoff.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Author of "Leading After a Layoff: Reignite Your Team's Productivity in
> Just 12 Weeks"
> <http://www.leadingafteralayoff.com>www.leadingafteralayoff.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>
>


-- 
Author of "Leading After a Layoff: Reignite Your Team's Productivity in Just
12 Weeks"
www.leadingafteralayoff.com

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Red 
Sox Citizens" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to