Unfortunately, his job is to get these knuckleheads to play. If he can't do
it - even if it's not his fault - then he's not effective.

He's a good man, though. Seems that way at least.

I'm missing the Carmine jokes. Is that a computer thing?

On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Matt & Olga McSorley <[email protected]
> wrote:

> Or maybe they should fire that bastard Carmine. :)
>
> *From:* Matt & Olga McSorley <[email protected]>
> *To:* "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Friday, September 30, 2011 11:43 AM
> *Subject:* Re: Tito Out
>
> Starting to read rumblings that players were a bit too entitled and not
> focused on their jobs (e.g. pitchers drinking beer during games they weren't
> pitching -- sounds like Lackey/Beckett to me); complaints about team buses &
> stuff that had nothing to do with winning games). Based on my observations
> of the team, which I grant are pretty fallible and uninformed -- I'm just
> telling you what I perceive -- it wouldn't surprise me in the least.
> Something about this team didn't look right to the naked eye.
>
> And if that's the case, I'm even more with Francona. Seems to me Francona
> didn't see his job as having to tell players to act professionally. They're
> paid a lot of money and you'd figure the need to act professionally would be
> impressed upon them at contract time.
>
> Maybe Francona doesn't want to stay. But if I were running the club and
> that's what I was facing, I'd clear out the problem players and keep a
> manager who has demonstrated he knows what it takes to win.
>
> -- Matt
>
> *From:* Tom Salemi <[email protected]>
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Sent:* Friday, September 30, 2011 10:16 AM
> *Subject:* Re: Tito Out
>
> Folks, we we just bypass the predictable media bashing. This is the way the
> business works. You had the manager and general manager on a stage SAYING
>  that here were problems in the locker room. The reporters run out, make
> calls to players and try to get as many specifics as we can.
>
> And NO ONE in ANY business is giving to give information that can come back
> and bite them (except for Kevin Millar who welcomed A-rod with open arms
> before the trade was made. He had to apologize to Nomar.) They also might
> not want to identify a teammate because they've got some sense of loyalty or
> fear.
>
> As for the Captain, that stuff is largely ceremonial. I mean it works for a
> while if the entire locker room buys into it. But if they don't, what the
> hell is Tek going to do. Even if he tried to hit them with a bat he'd
> probably miss.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Dan DiBiase <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I wish for once, that someone would publish names. All of this hinting
> about this stuff is bs. Who was 'lawless'? Who put their
> own interests before the teams? Why didn't the captain do anything about
> this? Isn't Tek culpable here too? Otherwise, why do
> you even have a captain?
>
> Dan D
> Central NJ USA
>
> *From:* Tom Salemi <[email protected]>
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Sent:* Friday, September 30, 2011 9:36 AM
> *Subject:* Re: Tito Out
>
> From the Herald...
>
> Discipline was clearly a problem, which is one of the perils of managing a
> high-priced team when some stars share a sense of entitlement. The Red Sox
> seemed content to ride their considerable talent out of the gates and ended
> up getting smacked in the face with a 2-10 start.
> A month later they were just 17-20 when Epstein traveled to New York and
> met privately with Francona and his coaches, a meeting Francona later
> described as “respectful,” to reinforce the need for the team to play
> passionate, fundamentally sound ball.
> The Sox rolled for the next four months, but their win totals often masked
> some fundamental flaws, flaws which became fatal in September when the
> clubhouse veered toward lawlessness and a number of players put their own
> interests ahead of those of Francona and the team.
> Francona admitted yesterday taking the incredible step of calling a team
> meeting on Sept. 7, one day after the Sox had pounded the Jays 14-0.
> “This team I think became challenging at the end,” Francona said. “There
> were some things I was worried about. We were spending too much energy on
> things that weren’t putting our best foot forward toward winning.
> “We spent a few minutes in the clubhouse that day talking about that. There
> were some things that did concern me. Normally as the season progresses,
> there are events that make you care about each other, and this club, it
> didn’t always happen as much as I wanted it to. And I was frustrated by
> that.”
> According to multiple sources with knowledge of the meeting, Francona was
> in part annoyed over complaints about the buses to the ballpark and wanted
> players to focus their energy more positively.
>
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Tom Salemi <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I do hope Theo stays. Not because of any man-love thing, I just like his
> approach (poor free agent record notwithstanding.)
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Tom Salemi <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Yeah, that's the talk around here on the morning shows.
>
> If I had to choose, I'd take him over the entire club house. But that isn't
> how it works.
>
> The wheels are definitely coming off the wagon. My antipathy for this team
> grows.
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Dan DiBiase <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Fox Sports reporting that he won' be back.
>
> Dan D
> Central NJ USA
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Red 
Sox Citizens" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.

Reply via email to