DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24234>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24234 Doesn't seem to be a way to use '\' in subst with back_references Summary: Doesn't seem to be a way to use '\' in subst with back_references Product: Regexp Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows NT/2K Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: Other Component: Other AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] specifically, trying to substitute "\$0" for "[.?]" doesn't seem to work - it is not possible to escape the '\' because of the logic in subst, so it always treats the $ as a literal (ie you get "$0" instead of eg "\."). also, is there any way to mark a substring of the regexp as literal (ie don't interpret metachars)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
