From: Marc Blanchet
Date: 2016-12-03 05:09
To: James Galvin
CC: Registration Protocols Extensions
Subject: Re: [regext] question regarding status
draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration
>I have said on the mike two meetings ago that there are multiple
>bundling drafts and instead of having many, the co-authors should work
>on a common framework/document. There has been some initial
>communications between them offline but more to come.
>
yes, we have some offline discussion.
currently, there are two kinds of bundling: strict bundling specified in
draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration
and relax bundling specified in draft-wilcox-cira-idn-eppext.
We have try to merge to these two kinds of bundling together, but it seems that
it is not easy to do so.
We initiated the text for common bundling for discusssion a few months ago, but
there has no big progress.
>I would suggest
>that we shall work towards a single framework instead of multiple
>incompatible ones.
my suggestion is that:
we still have co-operation to move the current strict bundling draft and relax
bunding draft ahead.
At same time, we also discuss whether we can produce a common bundling draft.
>For DNSbundled bof, I think nothing prevents the
>publication of an regext epp extension that would work on specific
>contexts and current deployments, while having another thread working on
>the larger issue.
yes, agree.
Jiankang Yao
>
>Marc.
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
