Good Morning,
I am a bit confused on the reseller drafts. I thought in Seoul we decided to review and comment but to not dedicate WG effort to these drafts? Thanks Roger -----Original Message----- From: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Gould, James Sent: Friday, March 03, 2017 7:36 AM To: Antoin Verschuren <i...@antoin.nl>; regext <regext@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [regext] Working Session @ IETF 98 Antoin, I’m willing to help facilitate or participate in the reseller drafts (draft-ietf-regext-reseller and draft-ietf-regext-reseller-ext) sub-group; although the draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees sub-group is a high priority for me. You may be able to split it based on EPP based sub-groups and RDAP based sub-groups. For the draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees sub-group, I particularly would like to discuss the policies around the handling of premium domain names. The specific policies that I would like to discuss include: 1. Should a create fail if the client does not pass a fee that is greater than or equal to the premium domain name fee? 2. Should a premium domain name be returned as unavailable in the check if the fee extension is not passed, since the create would most likely fail later in the purchase flow? 3. Should we have text in the draft with guidance around these and other policies? — JG James Gould Distinguished Engineer jgo...@verisign.com<mailto:jgo...@verisign.com> 703-948-3271 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 VerisignInc.com <http://verisigninc.com/> On 3/3/17, 5:23 AM, "regext on behalf of Antoin Verschuren" <regext-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of i...@antoin.nl<mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org%20on%20behalf%20of%20i...@antoin.nl>> wrote: Dear WG, Important questions below. As you may have seen, we have requested 2 meeting slots in Chicago. The first slot will be an experimental working session. It will be similar to this experiment: https://trac.ietf.org/trac/iesg/wiki/MeetingExperiments For this experiment to succeed, it will be vital that the participants have prepared. It will not be a session to sit in the back of the room reading email. This means: -You must have read and have an opinion or questions about at least one of the documents discussed here. -Prepare your questions or text and choose a subgroup from the listing below beforehand. The setup of this session will be as followed: -We will have a short introduction with a sum-up of the sub-groups and documents that will be discussed. -We may split up the group in sub-groups, and ask participants to close laptops and join a sub-group of their choice. -We have asked for a room setup where each sub-group will have at least a table to sit around. -We ask each sub-group to appoint a "facilitator” that will lead the discussion and summarize the results of the discussion afterwards. -If there are remote participants for your sub-group, we may ask on-site participants to assist in Skype or similar conferencing tools. -We expect a small presentation by the facilitator with the results of the sub-group discusion in the regular session later in the week. -You will have an opportunity in the regular session to ask questions to the whole working group if necessary. So far we have the following documents for this session: Facilitator: Document: Scott draft-hollenbeck-regext-rdap-openid Scott draft-hollenbeck-regext-rdap-object-tag Scott draft-fregly-regext-rdap-search-regex Roger draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-01 We are considering, but didn’t get confirmation from one of these authors yet: Facilitator: Document: Jacques? draft-ietf-regext-dnsoperator-to-rrr-protocol-02 Linlin/James? draft-ietf-regext-reseller-ext-01 Please let us know if you want to work on these documents during the working session. Perhaps people other than the authors may have an interest to discuss. Not all documents will have the same interest or expertise. Questions we have for the WG now: -Do you think we should treat the documents in parallel or serial ? We want to give enough time to each document to discuss and do actual work like writing text. Since Scott is leading 3 document discussions, it will be hard to treat them in parallel, but how about the others? -If you are a remote participant and want to join one of the discussions, please identify yourself on the mailinglist so on-site participants that will join the same sub-discussion can offer to assist in remote participation when we decide to treat them in parallel. It will also allow for the facilitator to get a sense of interest and prepare discussions. The preliminary agenda and call for agenda items for our regular meeting session will follow later today. Regards, Antoin and Jim. - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392 _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org<mailto:regext@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
