Hi, On Tue, Mar 26, 2019, at 5:11 PM, Mario Loffredo wrote: > > > > 3. JSContact - based on the DISPATCH meeting on Monday, it is unclear > > if JSContact will be moving forward in the IETF.
Speaking as an ART AD, I think I am happy to move quickly on this work if enough interest is expressed in something better than jCard. > My humble opinion is that, if we agree on replacing jCard, we should do > that ourselves rather than look at the DISPATCH JSContact. I attended > the DISPATCH session and I had the same your impression. In addition, as > I pointed out in a previous mail, I see some drawbacks in that proposal. > For example, the requirement of uniquely identifying a JSContact across > all JSContact objects by a UUID seems to me impracticable in the context > of registration data. I think it would be valuable if people can feed their comments on JSContact and express general interest in something that replaces jCard to the author of JSContact ([email protected]) Thank you, Alexey _______________________________________________ regext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
