> -----Original Message----- > From: Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2020 2:51 PM > To: The IESG <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; regext- > [email protected]; [email protected]; Hollenbeck, Scott > <[email protected]>; Hollenbeck, Scott > <[email protected]> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-dnrd- > objects-mapping-09: (with COMMENT) > > Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-regext-dnrd-objects-mapping-09: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email > addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory > paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://secure- > web.cisco.com/1W4L5pJ3TyJndjeWWepPJ0FYUtskoZH25tdV9KSXxHJKAETOV > VLYUrU9UwS7IpMbffNuBMRr1FoqkK_AYGSpMMbXvLodTA9tzoICBUI- > 2Nrnx6Mf9mkb0ye4qkvDMQvgWbHEXwz247RE03vC3Gfp85STTZtv9c_qSjk1p > 3Ey6vKdCH_yMR3NY23wgcbc2_2Tn73FHz645-DCJd9ESo517r3St_DvzzdIU9- > Hq- > 84c6j6PQg_36CgAhz6SnQuEWo6_/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fiesg%2 > Fstatement%2Fdiscuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://secure-web.cisco.com/1LRZMVfz2P0- > h9j7TBvAwsFXMfUmCjMvn9KguyOcseMpn2W7tiUjymb5xH2qfaIpi5XewFNIu > 4VCP3iOduGLdFWkFmDFdUt8Z0rgLZSOxVYuRO_HmgQNvVBNAmhVBsQiT2s > XlX3LQqqvpb0YZD9uxKfwyxuXhcfyIZeK4rG89aUTrsRj-W4foUixOz0Ht- > uMZUgluC7kTtKsJOxNLotmtrvEKcQb89w8fz2m6c3xCsPa8JK0j4Lfzw_EAOcRpj > axWJd6divcDTEFjbWpZpS82jg/https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc > %2Fdraft-ietf-regext-dnrd-objects-mapping%2F > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thank you for the work put into this document. Due to my heavy workload, I > did not review in details the model itself. > > Please find below a couple of non-blocking COMMENTs (a reply to my > COMMENTs will be welcome). > > I hope that this helps to improve the document, > > Regards, > > -éric > > == COMMENTS == > > A generic question about the point (5) of the document shepherd write-up: > "The AD is asking for further review from the Internationalization > Directorate, specifically on Section 10, which RECOMMENDS UTF-8 but allows > UTF-16. The working group cites RFC 5730, Section 5, and aligns with that. > The AD would prefer to deprecate UTF-16, and notes that RFC 5730, is now > well over 10 years old. Other opinions will be useful." > > Did the WG receive any other opinions ? It is not clear from the write-up.
I didn't see any opinions expressed, or anything being requested of the i18n directorate.. Scott (the document shepherd) _______________________________________________ regext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
