This Extended 2nd working group last call ended yesterday. Thank you to all that replied and did the effort for reviewing this document.
The chairs are confident that we now have the amount of support (+8 plus the document author and shepherd) for this document to be elevated to “Internet Standards”. The document shepherd for this document is Jasdip Singh. The chairs will ask the document shepherd to update the writeup to reflect this consensus, and we will then resubmit this document to the IESG. Thank you all, Jim and Antoin > Op 8 jan. 2021, om 15:58 heeft Jody Kolker <jkol...@godaddy.com> het volgende > geschreven: > > Nope – Support for 7483bis also. > > From: regext <regext-boun...@ietf.org <mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org>> On > Behalf Of Wilhelm, Richard > Sent: Friday, January 8, 2021 7:54 AM > To: shollenbeck=40verisign....@dmarc.ietf.org > <mailto:shollenbeck=40verisign....@dmarc.ietf.org>; i...@antoin.nl > <mailto:i...@antoin.nl>; regext@ietf.org <mailto:regext@ietf.org> > Subject: Re: [regext] EXTENDED 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis > > Notice: This email is from an external sender. > > > Support… sorry for late reply > > From: regext <regext-boun...@ietf.org <mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org>> on > behalf of "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck=40verisign....@dmarc.ietf.org > <mailto:shollenbeck=40verisign....@dmarc.ietf.org>> > Date: Thursday, January 7, 2021 at 7:50 AM > To: Antoin Verschuren <i...@antoin.nl <mailto:i...@antoin.nl>>, > "regext@ietf.org <mailto:regext@ietf.org>" <regext@ietf.org > <mailto:regext@ietf.org>> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] EXTENDED 2nd WG LAST CALL: > draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis > > Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click > links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the > content is safe. > > Feedback I’ve seen thus far: > > Expressions of support: 8 (Gustavo, Tom, James Gould, Maurizio, Mario, Roger, > Jasdip, Scott) > Expressions of concern: 0 > > I noticed that Jody expressed support for 7482bis, but not 7483bis. Jody, any > issues? > > Scott > > From: regext <regext-boun...@ietf.org <mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org>> On > Behalf Of Antoin Verschuren > Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 10:00 AM > To: regext@ietf.org <mailto:regext@ietf.org> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] EXTENDED 2nd WG LAST CALL: > draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis > > Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click > links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the > content is safe. > > Dear WG, > > WGLC for this document officially ended last night. > > Unfortunately we didn’t get enough support (+5) to declare overwhelming > consensus for elevation. > The chairs have decided to give you all another week and extend this WGLC > till Sunday 10 Januari 2021. > > This document is suggested to be elevated from “proposed standard” to > "Internet standard” as described by the process in RFC6410. > We therefor seek specific consensus from reviewers that they are aware of the > elevation requirements, and that they have reviewed this document with the > elevation intention in mind. > > Please review this document and indicate your support (a simple “+1” is > sufficient) or concerns with the publication of this document as “Internet > standard” by replying to this message on the list. > > Regards, > > Jim and Antoin > > > > > > Op 4 jan. 2021, om 04:07 heeft Tom Harrison <t...@apnic.net > <mailto:t...@apnic.net>> het volgende geschreven: > > On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 08:55:21PM +0100, Antoin Verschuren wrote: > > > This is a special second working group last call for: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis/ > <https://secure-web.cisco.com/1rMVdH4oTk-AKYMNtMXItY1IUVz7b88vgVCahyEdWmRuoq2FgBmXtbwXxfJ4PLJq8NyuvF8Q7n4-bpzlNOEzqHceYolK9yxhO7tepEmElO22dcw9j9rUYQYrJwO63KCKNmwN0vvjeKpeOH9AVZ3WxSD0FTwRHrXBDUscdakBlrxwlRqxfn_GZGHO9LWfsb9PS289kii0EAkF7DU0iZKAxUnb6AuwXagermYSsizO7ZbQT4AioHCCBJoMKFxkVkTXExVL1Tp8iCXD07697JiLP9w/https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis%2F> > > This document is suggested to be elevated from “proposed standard” > to "Internet standard” as described by the process in RFC6410. > We therefor seek specific consensus from reviewers that they are > aware of the elevation requirements, and that they have reviewed > this document with the elevation intention in mind. > > Please review this document and indicate your support (a simple “+1” > is sufficient) or concerns with the publication of this document as > “Internet standard” by replying to this message on the list. > > This WG last call will end Sunday, 2 January 2021. > > +1 > > -Tom > > _______________________________________________ > regext mailing list > regext@ietf.org <mailto:regext@ietf.org> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext > <https://secure-web.cisco.com/1MJmTSnd_yhutMLeNc27VRK9x6yOCTPtfgMwjc0ZxL5ExCBmpjjuIvQ-B0gUSn3g5EDZ5bU9e--I8TljOYZ6cuGnsyLovPSZntNvWSyMnnJBbm_Ttc45Y-7vmLhq-CpJBfWxmfmsFsIZiPuvQ-z2ckCxlv6I-C4rLdTX-xLaD30C5r8rKVwVLr0-bB5SMaB-Hr-T5zoS4AqGiH5KBcvUl4VdN5w60zG62PLv0tcVG1nRCM6nmVU_zkOee_OIov8vzUWIzRabe9bmQIbxvFDc0LQ/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fregext>
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
