Jothan,
Your message is confusing.
The subject of the message suggests you’re supporting rfc7484bis, but
the content of the message is all about registry-maintenance.
Would you please clarify your support?
Thanks,
Jim
On 15 Apr 2021, at 12:50, Jothan Frakes wrote:
+1 draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance looks good to me
Just to be clear, since this is a 2nd WGLC, the new WGLC is for
draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-12
Op 29 mrt. 2021, om 14:49 heeft Antoin Verschuren <i...@antoin.nl>
<<i...@antoin.nl>> het volgende geschreven:
The following working group document is believed to be ready for
submission to the IESG for publication as a standards track document:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance/
EXTRA ATTENTION: This is the second WGLC for this document. During
the
first WGLC, there were still some substantial comments to be
addressed, and
there was not enough positive feedback to declare consensus on this
document. Let’s do better this time and please take the time to
review this
document and indicate your support (a simple “+1” is sufficient)
or
concerns with the publication of this document by replying to this
message
on the list. Since we have 3 authors, we need more reviewers to state
support!
This WG last call will end at close of business, Monday, 12 April
2021.
The document shepherd for this document is James Galvin.
Regards,
Antoin and Jim
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
