On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 09:27:43AM -0500, James Galvin <gal...@elistx.com> wrote a message of 18 lines which said:
> This is the formal adoption request for DNS Data Dictionary: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-flanagan-regext-datadictionary/ OK for adoption, since this is a real issue and this draft is a good starting point. But I share George Michaelson's concerns: many words are very policy-loaded and it can be difficult to capture a standard definition for them. Also, I agree that the title should refer to domain names, not the DNS protocol (see draft-lewis-domain-names). Also: > This is the domain name in an EPP [RFC5731] domain object I see no reason to refer to EPP (domain names existed long before EPP). > and it MUST be in A-Label format. Why? The international version (U-label) seems more inclusive. > Individual names MAY be provided in either UTF-8 [RFC3629] or a > subset of UTF-8 that can be represented in 7-bit ASCII, Is the goal to describe semantics of a data element or also to specify its syntax? (In the last case, we need to specify the Unicode normalisation.) _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
