Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-24: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- # GEN AD review of draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-24 CC @larseggert Thanks to Susan Hares for the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) review (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/Pb3ulFRTmqoQ5FOhkYGLHrZ1zVE). ## Discuss (For discussion in the IESG, i.e., no action required from the authors.) This is likely me not understanding something, but I'd appreciate if someone could explain where this document fits into the current REGEXT charter scope? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ## Comments ### Inclusive language Found terminology that should be reviewed for inclusivity; see https://www.rfc-editor.org/part2/#inclusive_language for background and more guidance: * Term `natively`; alternatives might be `built-in`, `fundamental`, `ingrained`, `intrinsic`, `original` ## Nits All comments below are about very minor potential issues that you may choose to address in some way - or ignore - as you see fit. Some were flagged by automated tools (via https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool), so there will likely be some false positives. There is no need to let me know what you did with these suggestions. ### Outdated references Document references `draft-ietf-jsonpath-base-17`, but `-19` is the latest available revision. ### Grammar/style #### Section 12.2.3.1, paragraph 5 ``` | entity search based on the full name (a.k.a | | | formatted name) of an as ^^^^^ ``` The abbreviation/initialism is missing a period after the last letter. ## Notes This review is in the ["IETF Comments" Markdown format][ICMF], You can use the [`ietf-comments` tool][ICT] to automatically convert this review into individual GitHub issues. Review generated by the [`ietf-reviewtool`][IRT]. [ICMF]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md [ICT]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments [IRT]: https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
