Hi Rubens, The candidate RPP charter’s scope does include considering use cases for number resource provisioning but AFAIK, the RIRs as a whole are not presently thinking of doing so.
To James’ point, perhaps ok to consider the NIC BR’s EPP use cases for the EPP/RPP parity analysis but nothing more for now from the RIRs side. :) Thanks for pointing to the NIC BR’s EPP extensions. Jasdip From: Rubens Kuhl <[email protected]> Date: Friday, December 13, 2024 at 2:29 PM To: Jasdip Singh <[email protected]> Cc: Rubens Kuhl <[email protected]>, Gould, James <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: [regext] Re: [rpp] Re: EPP Extensibility and Extensions Analysis Jasdip, I believe that’s more of a overarching question of whether to address number resource provisioning in RPP. If RPP indeed encompasses number resources, than the -asn and -ipnetwork extensions should probably be included. Rubens Em 13 de dez. de 2024, à(s) 16:06, Jasdip Singh <[email protected]> escreveu: Hi Rubens, Since couple of these involve number resource provisioning, curious if it is desired from the NIC BR perspective that these use cases be considered upfront for RPP? Thanks, Jasdip From: Rubens Kuhl <[email protected]> Date: Friday, December 13, 2024 at 1:20 PM To: Gould, James <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: [rpp] Re: [regext] EPP Extensibility and Extensions Analysis James, Follows links to extensions in active use although not in the IANA registry, from use cases in the RIR/NIR system and ccTLDs: https://ftp.registro.br/pub/libepp-nicbr/draft-neves-epp-asn-02.txt https://ftp.registro.br/pub/libepp-nicbr/draft-neves-epp-brdomain-05.txt https://ftp.registro.br/pub/libepp-nicbr/draft-neves-epp-brorg-06.txt https://ftp.registro.br/pub/libepp-nicbr/draft-neves-epp-ipnetwork-02.txt Rubens > Em 13 de dez. de 2024, à(s) 13:46, Gould, James > <[email protected]> escreveu: > > Hi, In support of the RESTful Provisioning Protocol (RPP), a Tiger Team has > been formed to analyze the EPP extensibility and extensions. The starting > source for the EPP extensions is the EPP extensions IANA registry > (https://www.iana.org/assignments/epp-extensions). I encourage registering > and/or updating the EPP extensions in the EPP extensions IANA registry so > that the extensions are included in the analysis. Please let me know if > there are additional EPP extensions that need to be considered for the > analysis. The Tiger Team includes: > > • Jim Gould from Verisign > • Jody Kolker from GoDaddy > • Pawel Kowalik from DENIC > • Eric Skoglund from Internet Infrastructure Foundation > • Maarten Wullink from SIDN > Thanks, > -- > JG > > <image001.png> > > James Gould > Fellow Engineer > [email protected] > > 703-948-3271 > 12061 Bluemont Way > Reston, VA 20190 > > Verisign.com > _______________________________________________ > regext mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] _______________________________________________ rpp mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] _______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
