Hi, draft-bray-unichars [1], which is currently in IESG evaluation, describes Unicode subsets and the problems with just allowing anything Unicode in a text protocol.
This doc describes "unicode assignables" as the "subset as all the Unicode code points that are not problematic." I think it would be a good idea for the RDAP extensions draft to also limit RDAP extension identifiers, object class names, and JSON property names to the "unicode assignables" subset. What do people think? -andy, no hats [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-bray-unichars-14 _______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
