> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew (andy) Newton <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, May 30, 2025 3:26 PM
> To: Pawel Kowalik <[email protected]>; Gould, James <[email protected]>;
> Hollenbeck, Scott <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] Re: On bare identifiers in Extensions draft
>
> Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click 
> links
> or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
> safe.
>
>
> On 5/22/25 02:08, Pawel Kowalik wrote:
> > I would also not put too much value to prefixes. Typically the frameworks
> require full name anyway to access the object or to map it to a programming
> language representation.
> >
> > Actually I would be in favour of restoring the text of -04 2.4.5 with an 
> > explicit
> update to RFC9083 allowing the bare identifier pattern (which also would solve
> the issue of justification when SHOULD NOT could be broken and DE review
> interpretation issue). Contrary to other cases brought up by Andy (I-JSON,
> Unichars) I think this update would be OK in this draft, as it only affects
> extensions.
>
> I have written up a proposed compromise:
>
> https://secure-web.cisco.com/18e-
> FXFFrvru7_Ae6AK7p8rtjkZgn1wKIJulucJBH0gMF_pqcn_Z3P5XBbnRUhfr97Kg8jUe
> hdWb8w9S-08AxVMrEJ-9-
> GKwooCKhKE8j4j5gYXhRE3FgBEbbewwT227tVWzvXrBeZHC_fSYM_vZSApLm-
> vRwTXQXtrjazBqI0nerukoVr3BW2g_Weleak82qTdWaSSeLK2kqq82G-
> KUFkwURUKOiovtg2ElazRSk0KRcUy7joTxE9yR8auKQ_bHDBLf2OjTRNNh9t2CVF9
> tvWDfndWm2yO7mwVnz4KfXXmQ/https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fanewton19
> 98%2Fdraft-regext-rdap-extensions%2Fcompare%2Fmain...allow-bare

[SAH] "only when a technical solution cannot otherwise be defined". I still 
worry that we're going to have debates about what constitutes a "technical 
solution", but it sounds like the burden of proof will be on whomever is 
proposing to use a bare extension identifier.  I can live with that.

Scott
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to