On 6/16/25 07:56, Gould, James wrote:
Shouldn’t the x-media draft register the “extensions” RDAP extension identifier and use an extension identifier prefix in place of the bare identifier for the “extensions” media type parameter, such as “extensions_extensions”, “extensions_param”? I believe the x-media draft should include an RDAP extension registration, but I don’t believe there is the need to change from the use of the bare identifier.
I think "extensions_list" is probably what we want. Good point. I've created an issue for the next rev. -andy _______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
