Hello team, Could you please let us know if any information is already available to cover our question? We are looking forward to a response from you. _____________ Best regards, Daria Sydorenko Product Coordinator - Domains Compliance Namecheap/Spaceship
> On 05/27/2025 2:33 PM EEST Ksenia Chuprina <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hello Marc, > > Thank you for passing my query to the working group. > > We appreciate your efforts on RDAP, and if it helps you can use our Spaceship > RDAP Production environment with .ote domain names for tests, e.g. > https://rdap.spaceship.com/domain/xn--20001013-01-75066601--1726844587268632-17da086aa.work.ote > > > This is the only approach we can currently suggest. And just for you to know, > we have not yet upgraded to the RDAP 2024 version. Should that suit you, let > me know, and I will provide a few more .ote domain names. > > Have a wonderful one ahead! > > > On 05/26/2025 3:45 PM EEST Marc Blanchet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click > > links unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe. > > > > Hello, > > I’ll let the wg respond to your query. I’m writing to you because I’m the > > author of the RDAP Browser mobile app (iOS and Android). I’m working on a > > major update of both versions which will include Redacted. (I was one > > pushing for a better solution than just random strings saying no data > > here). If you have any test server/infrastructure that would contain the > > real data but in a non-production mode, and interested in interop testing, > > let’s talk! > > > > Regards, Marc. > > > > > > > Le 22 mai 2025 à 13:10, Ksenia Chuprina > > > <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > Greetings Team, > > > > > > I am a Business Analyst at Namecheap Inc, a Domain Registrar. > > > > > > We are currently working on the upgrade of our RDAP to the version 2024 > > > and we have questions about entities redaction. We reached ICANN, but > > > they have forwarded us to you. Hope you can help us with that: > > > > > > 1. We mainly use the redaction by ‘Replacement Value' method. We checked > > > that for the ‘Removal' method we can reference the whole object in the > > > 'redacted' member if all fields of that object are removed (e.g. Tech > > > contact). > > > > > > Can we do the same for the ‘Replacement Value’ method or do we need to > > > reference each redacted field separately in the ‘redacted’ member? > > > > > > 2. Many child members of the ‘redacted’ member are marked as ‘optional’ > > > in the RFC9537 > > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9537.html#name-redaction-by-removal-method. > > > > > > Is it totally up to us whether to include them or not, or do they become > > > obligatory on a certain condition? > > > > > > In particular, we have doubts about ‘postPath’ and ‘method’ members when > > > using the ‘Replacement Value’ redaction method, but it would be best to > > > know the approach to all members. > > > > > > 3. In the ‘name’ member of the ‘redacted’ member, can we always use the > > > ‘description’ field or is it a must to use the ‘type’ field for the > > > registered redacted names? > > > > > > If the latter is the case, where do we find the ‘registered redacted > > > names’? Are those the Values in the Appendix E of the RDAP Response > > > Profile > > > https://validator.rdap.org/specs/gtld/2024-02/rdap-response-profile-21feb24-en.pdf#page=16? > > > > > > FYI We checked that we will have more contact sets/fields than covered in > > > the Appendix, and also such values as ‘Registrant contact’ to reference > > > the whole object are absent in it, that’s why we are wondering if we can > > > always stick to the ‘description’ field. > > > > > > 4. Do we get this right that we can choose either ‘type’ or ‘description’ > > > field In the reason member of the ‘redacted’ member, or are they both > > > required? Where can we find the list of ‘registered redacted reasons’? > > > We saw Registries using ‘Server policy’ as a reason, is that okay to use > > > that by default? > > > > > > Looking forward to hearing from you. > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > Ksenia Chuprina > > > Business Analyst > > > BA&P Department > > > > > > Namecheap Inc. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > regext mailing list -- [email protected] > > > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > Ksenia Chuprina > Business Analyst > BA&P Department > > Namecheap Inc. >
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
