Hi Jasdip, On 18.06.25 19:43, Jasdip Singh wrote:
Correct. Being consistent is also my point but not necessarily in a twist that everything shall be always prefixed. I argument, that "IANA registration process shall identify any conflict" also applies to all other RDAP cases, thus rendering bare identifiers no issue for the interoperability or conflict potential between extensions.Hi Pawel,Totally agree with being consistent prefixing-wise for query requests and responses in RDAP extensions!But afraid, we might be overlaying this prefixing concept on to the media type space unnecessarily. If another RDAP extension ends up adding another parameter to “application/rdap+json” or another media type, the IANA registration process shall identify any conflict with existing parameters when updating that media type’s specification.
Thanks, Jasdip [...]
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
