> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Newton <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2025 3:00 PM
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-regext-ext-registry-
> epp-00 (Ends 2025-10-27)
>
> Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click 
> links
> or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
> safe.
>
> Hi,
>
> I have the following comments:
>
> 152      for both syntactic and semantic correctness.  For example, IETF
> 153      namespaces should be reserved for IETF specifications.
>
> This should be changed to:
>
>      IETF namespaces MUST be reserved for IETF specifications.
>
> I think we should also add the following:
>
>      Extensions and any normative reference necessary to implement the
> extension
>      MUST NOT be denoted with "work in-progress" or any similar description.

[SAH] Those are both good suggestions. Thanks!

Scott
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to