Hi Scott, On 07.11.25 11:56, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
Yes. I assume by that you mean that the namespace can be an IETF namespace and won't change after publicationI'm having a lot of difficulty understanding people's positions on the issues associated with registering Internet-Drafts and non-IETF specifications in the EPP extension registry. I'm going to ask some basic questions that I'd like people to answer to help me understand where we agree and disagree. These questions have simple "yes" or "no" answers. As given information, we know that RFC 3688 prohibits registration of XML schema and namespace URIs where the associated specification isn't an RFC.Should we allow registration of an active Internet-Draft on a provisional basis with the registered entity expected to be updated when the draft proceeds to RFC status?
Should we allow registration of an inactive or abandoned Internet-Draft knowing that the draft might not proceed to RFC status?
Yes
No, however visibility of namespaces used through EPP repository would help transparency. External registration won't surface squatting on someone else's namespace or even whole URI.Should we require non-IETF EPP extensions to register their URIs using non-IETF namespaces?
There will be other things to consider once we have agreement on the answers to these questions. Scott _______________________________________________ regext mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email [email protected]
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
