> -----Original Message----- > From: Gavin Brown <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, January 26, 2026 7:12 AM > To: RFC Errata System <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Jim Galvin <[email protected]>; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] Re: [Ext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9803 > (8718) > > Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click > links > or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is > safe. > > Hi folks, > > Firstly, thanks to Yixin Sun, who initially reported this to me privately, for > submitting this report. > > IIRC it was never the intention to prevent multiple custom RRs. Therefore I > believe the report is correct and should be accepted. Since it affects the XML > schema, I believe "Held for Document Update" should be the correct status, > since a change to the schema should also change the namespace URI. > However, I would welcome WG input on this.
[SAH] I agree, and I think that's the best approach. Scott _______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
