Hi Jim, > On 26 Jan 2026, at 1:14 pm, Gould, James <[email protected]> wrote: > > I agree that the report is correct, and I confirmed the issue and the fix in > our EPP SDK. I'm not sure whether changing of the namespace URI is necessary > here since the fix is backward compatible and meets the intent of the > extension. Existing implementations of the namespace URI will not be > impacted by replacing the XML schema with the corrected version.
I don't think this is the case. If client and server each implement different versions, then each could receive an EPP XML instance from the other that it would consider invalid. The only way for client and server to know which version the other implements is via the namespace URIs in the <extURI> elements in the <greeting>. Therefore a new URI is necessary, I think. G. -- Gavin Brown Principal Engineer, Global Domains & Strategy Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) https://www.icann.org _______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
