Hi Gavin, Andy,
From: Jasdip Singh <[email protected]> Date: Thursday, February 19, 2026 at 12:28 PM To: Gavin Brown <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: [regext] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-referrals-03.txt Like the “rdap-bootstrap” relation type idea! [JS] Though, one question comes to mind. IIUC, the core rationale for explicit RDAP redirects is to help clients avoid looking through the web links (“links” array) in an RDAP response for a specific target URI. But, wonder under which scenario(s) could a web link with the “rdap-bootstrap” relation type be returned in an RDAP response, if at all? Jasdip P.S. The “redirect_with_content” extension [1] might seem like a good fit here but, AFAIU, it comes into play after the RDAP bootstrap step. [1] https://raw.githubusercontent.com/APNIC-net/rdap-redirect-with-content/v1/apnic-rdap-redirect-with-content.txt
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
