> -----Original Message----- > From: Gould, James <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2026 1:19 PM > To: Hollenbeck, Scott <[email protected]>; [email protected] > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-regext-ext- > registry-epp-03 (Ends 2026-03-09) > > Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click > links > or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is > safe. > > Scott, > > Thank for the precise update. > > For the transports, if we can't get to consensus on including them in the EPP > extension registry, maybe we can go with Pawel's suggestion in creating a new > EPP transports IANA registry, which would include RFC 5734 to start for EoT > and can include registrations for EoH and EoQ. The registry would need to be > defined in one of the new transport drafts. Would we define the EPP > transport registry in both and then remove it from the transport that > progresses last? > > I don't believe removing the text is necessary unless there is a better > proposal > on the purpose of the EPP extension registry to replace it with.
[SAH] Registry creation can be done in whichever transport draft progresses first. The EoQ draft may be the best place to do it. Scott Scott _______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
