On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 01:50:16PM +0200, Markus Raab wrote: > > I don't think that this workflow collides with elektra.
I hope too, that's why I follow development here. But, really, I don't need elektra myself: I don't need to configure a lot of softwares (I need to configure mutt, procmail, esmtp, ssh, fluxbox startup scripts and shortcuts) and for those softwares I already have config files. Still it seems to me to be an interesting innovation, especially for other users (like the users I administer). > But the explict static libraries are not accepted by automake 1.10.x anymore > (at least at cpp binding). So we need to remove > #AC_DISABLE_STATIC > in configure.ac and remove the > lib_LIBRARIES = libelektra.a > libelektra_a_SOURCES = $(elektra_sources) > part in src/libelektra/Makefile.am? > > Why is it done like it is now? That should be really documented. I'll have a look at it, but basically we have to compile all the backends in libelektra.a - wa cannot expect that dlopen will work -- that's what explains all the complications. > Yeah, but there are solving a very essential and generic problem so the name > is warrantable. From a distribution point of view, this is very dubious, especially since elektra isn't still used a lot (though this may change now that it is packaged). -- Pat ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Registry-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/registry-list
