----- Original Message -----
From: Mark Finn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2001 9:54 AM
Subject: Re: [rehfans] Howard as boy's fiction
> Interesting point, Gary. I really have no problem with that. Look at the
> list of authors you gave us...does anyone really mind having Howard in
such
> distinguished company? Considering how popular the Potter books are (and
> make no mistake, they are CLASSIC boy's adventure fiction, just slightly
> more British), I think that would be the way to go with his material.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Gary A Romeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, April 06, 2001 11:29 AM
> Subject: [rehfans] Howard as boy's fiction
> > I was looking in the bookstore once again in the children's section.
> > They have a good selection of adventure fiction there. Jack London,
> > Robert Louis Stevenson, Howard Pyle, Mark Twain, Edgar Allan Poe, and
> > Burrough's Tarzan of the Apes. All great stuff.
>From my latest Ansible email: note the last line
J.R.R.TOLKIEN placed seventh (just below Andy Warhol, just above Frank
Sinatra) in a Forbes `cemetery rich list' of stupendous posthumous
earners, with takings of #4.8 million in 2000. But Dr Seuss and Charles
Schulz are doing rather better, at fourth and second place respectively:
`Books do not pay, unless you write for children.' (_Times_, 14 Mar) [MP]
Scotty Henderson
