Hi all!
at the moment i'm testing some FS for our low coast filer,
is an dual P3 866MHz, ICP Vortex(64Bit PCI), Easyraid(HW-Raid,250GB),
512MB Ram with Suse 7.2, kernel 2.4.5 from kernel.org,
knfsd_patch, umount fix patch. now my I/O results with
bonnie++, file size 1GB, fsync() enabled !!!
Sequential Output:
ReiserFS ext2
per Chr: 11216 K/sec 12639 K/sec
Block: 24815 K/sec 26133 K/sec
rewrite: 9717 K/sec 9534 K/sec
Random Output:
per Chr: 10199 K/sec 11531 K/sec
block: 21830 K/sec 24025 K/sec
Seeks: 230 /sec 344 K/sec
default mkfs options !!
ext2: Block size = 4096, inodes = 11272192, blocks = 22515089
reiser: Journal size 8192, Root block 8211
got great performance tests with bonnie++ cration tests,
small files;
only problem, is reiserfs real stable for an production
system ?? need no high performance, only stability, and
journaling, so i think i'll try GFS looks more stable,
XFS looks nice too, but i think its to new too, means some
little bugs,........ i dont know, lets test it, test it.....
