On Tuesday, July 31, 2001 11:01:23 PM +0200 Manuel Krause <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You meant "find -inum 39253"? Heavy work to find this term searching this > NG ;-) Yes, sorry about that. > But the method worked. At that inode I found a netscape cache file > what may? show that my vs-: message is unrelated to "unlink-truncate..." > patch -> as no NS was open and I did an extra sync before turning off > power with a running vmware. Yes, the vs-: messages are not related to the unlink-truncate patch at all. [ snip ] > > Now, it's needless to say that your patch made it impossible for me to > reproduce this vs-: message in the context it previously appeared here. > Good to hear ;-) > Having in mind your and Vladimirs discussion from yesterday: It is ok, > that I leave it applied? Risk risk? > I believe Vladimir was disagreeing with the problem description, not the patch. The patch itself is safe.... -chris
