On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 09:15:19AM -0700, Nicholas Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[turning off write-cache]
> I'm sorry, but that's not acceptable.
(I had it turned off for a long time, until I reasoned: real power-outages
are very rare, so I can leave it turned on anyways and risk a
filesystemcheck after outages).
The reason this kills performance ALWAYS is that ide does not support large
enough transfer sizes (8-32k on most drives) to fill one track.
Turning off write caching has a big chance of lowering your transaction
throughput to the drive's RPM. Combined with linux' not-that-optimal elevator
and write behaviour this has good chances of costing a lot of performance.
TCQ will obviously help, but I somehow doubt it will work fine - even with
SCSI TCQ is a nightmare (the aic7xxx drive regularly kills my system if
tagged queueing is enabled for example). IDE currently is a mess (I do
_not_ expect my drive performance to simply halve just because two devices
to share the bus, even if this is how conservative ide is destined to
work).
I am convinced that there is a way of creating a hard write barrier (e.g.
a cache flush that waits) with most if not all ide disks - putting them
into powersave should work, if nothing else ;)
So apart from driver issues (such as TCQ), the mid-layer needs to be improved
(and plans already exist) to support semi-ordered writes and give as much
control over the device cache as possible.
Not to mention that the VM needs improvements here as well.
I didn't say much more than Alan implied: we have to live with it, so we
better think about making it work.
--
-----==- |
----==-- _ |
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +--
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e|
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+
The choice of a GNU generation |
|
