Hello! On Sat, Mar 22, 2003 at 12:58:45AM +0100, Manuel Krause wrote:
> GRIN !!! I really would like to enjoy these, but you seem to be far > away in future. Still no "official" patch seems to be out -- at least > for me on here. (Yes, I'll wait and would not use bk.) > Have your previously pending patches been included into 2.4.21-pre6 > (they are: 02-trivial1.diff > 03-more-mount-checks.diff > 01-journal-overflow-fix.diff > from ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiserfs-for-2.4/testing : > iget5_locked_for_2.4.21-pre5-datalogging.diff.gz > and posted to our ML @ "Wed, 12 Mar 2003 10:46:42 +0300" : > direct-io-fix-II.diff > ) ? Only patches that are visible at ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiserfs-for-2.4/2.4.20-pending were included into 2.4 tree. iget5_locked patch is in testing right now. direct-io-fix-II.diff have triggered some old long known minor metadata updating problems in case of unexpected crash and I am looking how to resolve that and trying various stuff. > My question only results from beeing unable to get them all applied to > 2.4.21-pre5 with data-logging without rejects and me feeling unsafe to > adjust them manually. Well, if you apply all of those patches from ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiserfs-for-2.4/2.4.20-pending on clean 2.4.20 (or whatever is needed for 2.4.21-pre5 only frpm ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiserfs-for-2.4/2.4.21-pre5.pending) and then apply data logging patches as if you have 2.4.21-pre6, and then iget5_locked stuff, it should work. Bye, Oleg
