Hello!
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 09:32:30AM +0300, Oleg Drokin wrote:
> Please either do not apply this patch or follow the rebuild-sb advance (it will ask
> you
> if you want to update journal paremreters and you should agree).
> I will come up with the fix shortly.
Ok, here's supposed fix.
If you have not did rebuild-sb, you might want to try it.
(for those using data-logging patches, you do not need this patch as it does correct
thing already).
Bye,
Oleg
===== fs/reiserfs/journal.c 1.26 vs edited =====
--- 1.26/fs/reiserfs/journal.c Thu Mar 13 14:52:15 2003
+++ edited/fs/reiserfs/journal.c Tue Mar 25 16:38:55 2003
@@ -1401,7 +1401,7 @@
*newest_mount_id) ;
return -1 ;
}
- if ( le32_to_cpu(desc->j_len) > sb_journal_trans_max(SB_DISK_SUPER_BLOCK(p_s_sb))
) {
+ if ( le32_to_cpu(desc->j_len) > JOURNAL_TRANS_MAX ) {
reiserfs_warning("journal-2018: Bad transaction length %d encountered, ignoring
transaction\n", le32_to_cpu(desc->j_len));
return -1 ;
}
