Hello!
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 10:34:30AM +0200, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> Today a raid0 (stripe set) crashed here (there is a bug in western
> digital disks - they sometimes need a power cycle to accept commands
> again) and I ran the latest reiserfsck on /dev/md0 with --rebuild-sb
> --rebuild-tree.
> It successfully finished rebuilding the tree but now I observe the same
> thing robin observes: I cannot mount the device... so I ran reiserfsck
> /dev/md0 again and it complained that there is no superblock on the
> drive. So I tried to create one with reiserfstune --make-standard-journal
Well, if there is no superblock, it will certainly refuse to mount.
> /dev/md0 but that one just segfaults (unfortunately I have gcc on that
> machine as /usr /var are on the stripeset :-( ).
Is it just segfaults without any messages?
Anything interesting in the logs?
What reiserfsprogs version do you use?
> This is really strange since reiserfsck was really enumerating over all
> the files and everything seemed to be fine after the first rebuild-tree.
Hm, might it be that your harddrive eaten the superblock that it was supposed to write
to disk? ;)
> Hmm, I am running kernel 2.4.21pre6
Hm, new IDE changes? What if you try same stuff on 2.4.20?
Bye,
Oleg
