On 13 Feb, Nikita Danilov wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>  > http://developer.osdl.org/markw/fs/dbt2_stp_results.html
>  > 
>  > I have some data (at the link above) with the reiser4 2004.02.06
>  > snapshot applied to linux-2.6.2 with our DBT-2 (OLTP) workload on 4-way
>  > and 8-way systems.  On the 4-way systems, the results of the workload
>  > seem comparable to other filesystems.  On the 8-way systems, the results
>  > of the workload drop about 28%.
>  > 
>  > I have readprofile and oprofile (w/ annotated assembly) data with the
>  > results.  If there's anything else I can provide let me know.
> 
> That's very impressive. Thank you for data.
> 
> Do I understand correctly that you have applied the same reiser4 patch
> (from 2004.02.06 snapshot) to the 2.6.2, 2.6.1-mm2, 2.6.1, and
> 2.6.0-mm2?
> 
> Also note strange results for ext2 on 4-way 2.6.1-mm2: it's like order
> of magnitude slower than other contestants. Are test results averaged
> over multiple runs?

I've only been able to test reiser4 on 2.6.2.  I've been trying to track
filesystem performance and have done it with 2.6.2, 2.6.1-mm2, 2.6.1,
and 2.6.0-mm2, but I haven't been able to get results for every filesystem
for one reason or another.

Oh yeah, that ext2 4-way 2.6.1-mm2 result is way off.  In most cases, I
haven't tried repeating results.  But other than weird cases like that,
they usually don't vary so much.

Mark

Reply via email to