Am Donnerstag, den 26.08.2004, 13:28 +0200 schrieb Andrea Arcangeli: > then what's the difference in having the plugin fixed in stone into > reiserfs? That's my whole point.
I think you're not exactly understanding what a reiser4 "plugin" is. Currently plugins are not modules. It just means that there's a defined interface between the reiser4 core and the plugins. Just like you could see filesystems as "VFS plugins". In fact, reiser4 plugins are - users of the reiser4 core API - some of them are implementing Linux VFS methods (thus being some sort of glue code between the Reiser4 storage tree and the Linux VFS)
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil