On Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 03:18:07PM +0400, Alexander Lyamin wrote: > Yes, I think it would be nice to have this infrastructure in VFS. Technically. > But its not possible, cause of "committee clusterfuck". Socially. Stupidly.
Please explain your problems. I've not seen a single actually working proposal yet. Current reiser4 implementation apparently oopses and breaks guaranteed fs semantics, it's not going in in either reiser4 or the vfs. Al has started a thread to hash out working semantics, but there's not been a single namesys person involved. Similar all of you have absolutely ignore every single technical question or comment but started a flamefest consisting mostly of personal attacs and "mine is longer" politics.
