On Fri, 2004-09-10 at 06:22, Hans Reiser wrote: > He asked me, why not just access a filename's size as filename/size?
I now understand that you need a way to distinguish between something like shoe/size and shoe/.../size (or shoe/..size) The first one is the size of the shoe, the second is the automatically generated size of the file (object). You would get into trouble if you would not allow the user to use shoe/size for shoe size. Peter