>Go back and re-read the whole flame-fest, understand all the points >raised, and let us know when you have a workable proposal. > >(Hint - "file as directory" broke a number of programs that didn't >expect that a file *could* be a directory, when run on a reiser4 >filesystem...)
So let's keep it to reiser4 as to not wildly break programs running on other filesystems used in "stable kernels". I'm saying that everybody who runs a R4 FS knows that apps might break, and thus is responsible for making them ready for reiser4. (Or ask the prog's maintainer.) Jan Engelhardt -- Gesellschaft fÃr Wissenschaftliche Datenverarbeitung Am Fassberg, 37077 GÃttingen, www.gwdg.de
