On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 10:19:57AM -0800, Hans Reiser wrote: >For the case Peter cites, yes, it does add clutter to the pathname to >say "..metas" (actually, it is "...." now in the current reiser4, not >"..metas"). This is because you aren't looking for metafile
"...." shound like something that could be an alias for ../.. so not much better than reserving the word "metas" from the namespace. I guess I'll still go with ..metas here, as it's the best compromise showed. Or maybe even ..meta (as there is no need for the plural imo) Just re-opening a damned useless, old, tired and daft can of worms :P -- mjt
