Hello On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 16:33, James Courtier-Dutton wrote: > Vladimir Saveliev wrote: > > Hello > > > > On Fri, 2005-04-29 at 22:38, Dr. Giovanni A. Orlando wrote: > > > >>Hi Everyone, > >> > >> Looking on the latest 2.6.11.4, I don't see yet Reiser4 officially > >>included between the supported FS. > >> > >> Reiser4 had been released almost one year ago, and ... does not > >>belong yet to the kernel? > >> > >> Hans, do you know some date for this? > >> > >> In the past Andrew Morton, did this job, I don't know who (if > >>someone) are working on this matter. > >> > >> It is not fundamental, just a simple but important curiosity. > >> > > > > > > We are working to address lkml objections (they objected to core kernel > > patches reiser4 relays on) and reiser4 stability. > > When it is done (can not estimate, sorry) - then we will ask for > > inclusion. > > > > > >>Thanks, > >>Giovanni. > >> > > What exactly did they object to? Are their objections easily addressed? >
They were on principle against ftp://ftp.ru.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.12-rc3/2.6.12-rc3-mm2/broken-out/reiser4-allow-drop_inode-implementation.patch ftp://ftp.ru.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.10-rc3/2.6.10-rc3-mm1/broken-out/reiser4-perthread-pages.patch ftp://ftp.ru.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.12-rc3/2.6.12-rc3-mm2/broken-out/reiser4-export-inode_lock.patch and few older patches. We are currently trying to eliminate the need in reiser4-export-inode_lock.patch which is the last of bad patches. This one seems to be the hardest to get rid of. > James >
