On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 11:49:51PM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote: > Regarding trust, Christophe comes out the gate using the words "useless > abstraction layer" that happens to be a core feature of our design, > demanding we cut it out, and not really understanding it or recognizing > any functionality it provides, and you can't really expect me to respect > this, can you? > > Now, if his target is reduced to whether we can eliminate a function > indirection, and whether we can review the code together and see if it > is easy to extend plugins and pluginids to other filesystems by finding > places to make it more generic and accepting of per filesystem plugins, > especially if it is not tied to going into 2.6.13, well, that is the > conversation I would have liked to have had.
Have I missed the posting with analysis of changes in locking scheme and update of proof of correctness? If so, please give the message ID. _That_ had been the major showstopper for any merges, IIRC.
