-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Gregory Maxwell wrote: > On 6/27/05, Hans Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>. But nevertheless it didn't survive, as like V3, with time V4 became >>>slower and slower. In this case no year was needed, but just one month or >>>alike. So end of test...but in fact I'll give V4 another go in the near >>>future. >> >>Interesting that it got slower with time. It sounds like our online >>repacker is much needed. It will be a priority for after the kernel merge. > > > Whered it go, I recall it being activated with: > echo 1 >/sys/fs/reiser4/*/repacker/start
That proved to be unstable (on my box, the repacker never finished) and there was also some talk of making it only available commercially -- that is, pay some amount based on how much storage you're using it on, get the repacker. I like open source better, but whatever amount was proposed is more than fair for me, especially considering how fast stuff is even without the repacker. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQIVAwUBQsGv0XgHNmZLgCUhAQKluQ/+Pjg6h5qUpO/6pG7v8ku2OhyUoR6aneTb FlqjaqNuxqKaT/C3iqZYLZ+YUk+MYdXKUYNthdlY9ZtaPNwnp34/AHUSLtU4Imgw Z4kIn3csKCkpeLRQMJ1o5nRSBwa+38Ta17ktYhn7L+ln53/ElULbPrmxjoSmA+SK ocjkVcUI8azJJosD1Y0tb5BSVa9PC+buPOgbkinvFVeme2ouwG+tAeAMECShface 0FbT1+Ai//S/t5rz/oz6BzlV+K7Jl+8OopFs9MnwD8Gqh21zeGiawLQGsDwvZuEt wJq73Y6b573RVJUy4dHAUqBZen0gar1GPWS2RpB3RwIYgb7/Ui3Rf5t//vTrZMNo Ej9R3AXcU82M8YHHmwr1QJfhrt7kddXPw5TSpA66RWNJdeFxoaXxja6sFFjQbSTs G5BHy2P/oHO8+uhbS+NI8T1N8KsrRrhJWr0pcjhHaoDogGdUj7TZtB+fANgLHbdV GstRVz8QvKGOZ8FrX/mMPzsfUbRx3pq+C/FJzSgqVI/4oTc/XIOS7cb92EC+1WrO KhYI3vy1zeKximboJXrPlr7QXkakjoOSFNH/MVzmF3sP1pe92hey7SXrpfgrOCOa 8gVo0u1tE98fuatl3MA8t3OGXGM5JXKpHVk/FiQt4358wAMmyDizvOeZ3GL1CA/M ixjK/caPrP0= =LFCF -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
