Pekka Enberg wrote: >Andrew Morton wrote: > > >>>There's also the custom list, hash and debug code. We should either >>> >>>a) remove them or >>> >>>b) generify them and submit as standalone works or >>> >>>c) justify them as custom-to-reiser4 and leave them as-is. >>> >>> > >On 6/29/05, Hans Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>either b) or c) is ok with me for the list code. The debug code should >>be c) I think. >> >>Probably vs can offer a more detailed and accurate opinion, >> >> > >I completely agree that the current state of the generic hashing >facilities is somewhat poor but I fail to see why you can't use ><linux/list.h>. > > I'll let vs and maybe nikita comment.
>As for the debugging code, I would love to see that turned into >something generic (every subsystem has their own now) but it is >definitely not something that should stop you from merging. > > Pekka > > > > If I encourage you to make a patch, is that ok of me?
