On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 17:36:49 +0200, evilninja said: > Gabor HALASZ schrieb: > > Sep 5 12:30:24 sk8n kernel: ReiserFS: dm-10: checking transaction log > > (dm-10) > > Sep 5 12:30:24 sk8n kernel: ReiserFS: dm-10: Using rupasov hash to sort > > names > > why did you choose the rupasov hash? > http://www.namesys.com/mount-options.html knows: > > rupasov: [...] Never use it, as it has high probability of hash > collisions.
Why is it selectable then? Yes, I know there's needs to support borked legacy filesystems that were mkfs'ed before the problem was recognized. That means fsck.reiserfs needs to know about it - but mkfs.reiserfs?? Seen in the Fedora Core devel tree as of tonight: % rpm -q reiserfs-utils reiserfs-utils-3.6.19-2 % strings /sbin/mkfs.reiserfs | grep -i rupasov rupasov -h | --hash rupasov|tea|r5 hash function to use by default
pgpCEjTycKelh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
