Łukasz Mierzwa wrote: > Dnia Fri, 16 Sep 2005 14:40:22 +0200, Gregory Maxwell > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał: > >> On 9/16/05, Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> yeah, but it is to be used by the end-user. >>> >>> the archive will be still filled with spam. >>> >>> not everyone who wants to know about reiser subscribes to the list; most >>> of the people would just use the archives. >> >> >> I actually subbed to the list because I was frustrated by spam in the >> archive. >> Whomever runs the archive should at least just pipe it through spam >> assassin. If some legitimate messages are lost from the web archive it >> could not be worse than what we have now, an archive made nearly >> useless from excessive spam. >> > > If You will look in the headers of messages that You get from this list > You will see that there is spamassassin running on thebsh.namesys.com, > it's just that it is not configured good enough.
Can spamassassin be configured "good" enough? I use dspam: http://www.nuclearelephant.com/projects/dspam/ There are some articles about why dspam has a fundamentally better design than spamassassin, and why in general statistical filters beat manual-rule-based ones like spamassassin.
